Sign in
Download Opera News App

News Politics




Africa politics

EFF stuns parliament by rejecting Land Expropriation Bill – but why?

Members of Parliament debated the modification of Section 25 of the Constitution to permit for land expropriation without repayment on Tuesday, 7 December. Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) chief Julius Malema stated the birthday celebration rejects the Bill as it will set returned African humans’s warfare for land repossession.


The ANC’s Dr Mathole Motshekga – the chairperson of the Land Expropriation Ad Hoc committee – opened the talk at the 18th Amendment Bill on Tuesday with a “records lesson.”

He said the “original sin” became when indigenous African humans have been dispossessed of the land through the Dutch and British settlers. In his prolonged speech, he cast aspersions on the events that might no longer be given the Bill and said “unholy coalitions” – regarding the 2021 Local Government Elections, which saw the ANC lose electricity throughout the united states – would soon disintegrate and the voters could go back to the ruling birthday party.

The DA’s Parliament Caucus Parliament Chairperson Dr Annelie Lotriet spoke 2nd and unsurprisingly stated that her birthday celebration rejects the Bill.

She said the Bill creates uncertainty around property rights, which isn't always what the u . S . A . Needs as the financial system recovers from the impact of the pandemic and added that the Bill fails the Constitutional take a look at.

Julius Malema also rejected the Bill on behalf of the EFF. He said that the Bill that parliament is asked to approve nowadays will take African people’s war for land repossession many steps again.

Malema said the ANC hijacked the land expropriation with out reimbursement parliamentary procedure and said the birthday party is “hell-bent” on shielding the pursuits “of the white settler minority.” He accused the birthday party of being completely captured through “white monopoly capital.”

The EFF chief stated the contemporary Bill makes meaningless provisions for the state to be the custodian of “certain land” without defining what “positive land” involves.

The EFF took trouble with the idea of “nil compensation” inside the Bill, which they are saying changed into no longer present whilst parliament followed the EFF’s land expropriation without compensation movement in 2018 and while it was adopted in the report of the Constitutional Review Committee.

Malema stated “nil compensation” become vague and the birthday party rejects it honestly because of its vagueness as it would allow for restrained times wherein compensation for land could be offered at below the marketplace value of the land.

“If this Bill is allowed to bypass, it might represent a sell-out position and a further disenfranchisement of black humans.

“The realistic implications of this Bill might be a long way worse that the modern-day Property Clause of the Constitution.

“We reject this Bill and get in touch with on the millions of our humans to do something it takes to get their land lower back.

“We attempted, but the parliamentary procedure changed into hijacked by the ANC and their handlers, and until we've got an amazing majority in parliament, black people will live landless in this country,” said Malema.

Other events along with the IFP, FF+, ACDP and others had expressed their competition to the Bill by the time of book.

EFF stuns parliament by rejecting Land Expropriation Bill – but why? (

Content created and supplied by: donnapaulsin (via Opera News )

ANC EFF Julius Malema Land Expropriation Bill Mathole Motshekga


Load app to read more comments