Sign in
Download Opera News App

 

 

Look what Dali Mpofu said in court about Jacob Zuma that left Mzansi in shock

Ishmail Jamie SC, an attorney for the Department of the Attorney General, denied that the parties had attempted to obtain court-ordered confirmation of Zuma's medical records for a judge hearing their inquiry on the legitimacy of his clinical parole.

Without a favourable recommendation from the clinical parole board, a public body is unable to grant Zuma clinical release, according to him.


DA legal counsel Ishmail Jamie SC denied that the case meeting had attempted to obtain confidential confirmation of Zuma's clinical records for the specified body hearing their court on the benefits of his clinical parole. He asserts that the DA's position is that a public authority cannot grant Zuma clinical parole in the absence of any favorable recommendation from the clinical parole board.


Mpofu stated that it would be "draconian" if Zuma were asked to serve a another 10 months before being released.


Where he will fight will be a result of the decision to disregard his clinical parole experience as part of his punishment. We now address one of the Matojane organization's most real flaws: its desire that Zuma's time on clinical parole not count towards his sentence.


Mpofu reiterated that the administration was "revolting" and condemned Zuma's record once more.


We now reach one of the most authentically revealing aspects of the Matojane organization: its desire that Zuma's time on medical parole not count towards his sentence. <p></p><p> Mpofu described the organization as "shameful" and attacked Zuma once more.


Mpofu said that the secret justification for Zuma's therapeutic parole was the revelation that he was suffering from a terminal illness - a condition for which he acknowledged the former president required 24-hour care. Such consideration is unavailable to Zuma in prison, according to Mpofu.


Mpofu said that the primary justification for Zuma's clinical parole was the disclosure that he was suffering from a terminal illness, a condition for which the former president required 24-hour care. Such thoughts are inaccessible to Zuma in prison, according to Mpofu.

Makgoka enquired as to whether Mpofu's concerns over Zuma's detention conditions were treatment-related as opposed to parole-related.

Mpofu argued that sending Zuma back to prison would be comparable to "leaving him" due to the penitentiary director's clarification that there are no professionals who can commit him.

Mpofu argued that sending Zuma back to prison would be tantamount to "abandoning" him because the director of detention facilities emphasized that there were no experts who could commit him.


Makgoka added that he struggled with how Zuma, as a 79-year-old guy, was meant to fight for him and support him in prison.


Mpofu said that Fraser was able to assess the "reality" that, as a former president, Zuma was "entitled" to a 24-hour clinical examination. He promises that Zuma is not comparable to all other people.


Mpofu said that Fraser may have considered the "fact" that, as a former president, Zuma was "entitled" to a 24-hour clinical examination. He asserts that Zuma is distinct from all other individuals.


Mpofu: "Regardless of whether the charges are valid and given the new objective of the screen, there is not the tiniest piece of evidence to suggest that the decision of clinical parole while alive is not lawfully acceptable by a sitting public judge."

"Any new decision will be based on the most recent clinical evidence. The August political decision has little bearing on what may occur if new evidence is presented to another pioneer. The actual board may return an optional update option.


"The August political decision that condemned a candidate is essentially old information and probably has no bearing on any later political choice the court might be asked to make. Similarly, the request for further clarification is also insightful."


Mpofu: "Even though the accusations are serious and given the increased watch requirement, there is no evidence to suggest that the decision of clinical parole, assuming it is still a live matter, cannot be recognized as a real public demonstration." head.


"However, any new decision will be based on the most recent clinical evidence. The August ruling has no bearing on what may occur when new verification is scheduled prior to another pioneer. The actual Board could issue a substitute ruling upon appeal." In conclusion, the censured August decision is old information that will likely have minimal bearing on a future decision that the court may require to be made. Similarly insightful is the use for this additional explanation."


Mpofu asserts that Fraser acted with bias because he was Zuma's former government usable administrator, but demands that these "senseless" charges have no bearing on the current Public Chief.


This is the reason, he argues, that if Zuma's clinical parole is deemed invalid, the Public Magistrate can be summoned to reconsider whether he should be granted ordinary parole.


Source:https://twitter.com/News24/status/1559163272175157248?t=OHTf5RTofxJEarRhBE0mqw&amp;s=19

Content created and supplied by: Flammydesk (via Opera News )

DA Department of the Attorney General Ishmail Jamie Ishmail Jamie SC Matojane

COMMENTS

Load app to read more comments