Sign in
Download Opera News App

News Politics

 

Politics

 

Africa politics

Malema questions delays in handing down Concourt judgments

The speed at which the Constitutional Court gives over decisions on dire issues went under the spotlight during the principal day of meetings for Concourt decided on Monday.


EFF pioneer and JSC official Julius Malema asked passes judgment on Fayeeza Kathree-Setiloane and Judge Rammaka Mathopo, during their different meetings, for their musings on this.


Malema was alluding especially to the Constitutional Court's deferral in administering on previous president Jacob Zuma's application for a rescission of the scorn of court request against him.


Malema said the matter was welcomed on a critical premise under the steady gaze of the court, and the deferral in the giving over of the judgment was inadmissible.


Malema said there was an incredible feeling of vulnerability in the nation while hanging tight for the judgment.


"The nation was in a real sense consuming," he said.


He further scrutinized the meeting up-and-comers on how Concourt judges could be considered responsible for such deferrals.


"The Constitutional Court consumes a huge chunk of time to return to us with such a lot of vulnerability; how would we manage that? Is that improving the great picture of the legal executive, and, if not, who will be considered responsible?" he inquired.


Kathree-Setiloane concurred that, when the case was earnest, the decision should have been conveyed "with the essential criticalness".


She said she comprehended the disappointments in trusting that significant decisions will be given over expediently, and said the judges likewise expected to control themselves and compose more limited decisions.


Malema found out if the "standards and guidelines" that applied to High Court decisions were not relevant to the ConCourt.


Mathopo kept up with that Malema raised a "reasonable remark" and proposed Acting Chief Justice Raymond Zondo should reclaim these worries to his partners at the summit court.


The JSC started its re-run of the Constitutional Court interviews after issues with the underlying procedures were stopped.


The South Gauteng High Court in August this year requested the JSC to reconvene and meet the eight contender for positions in the Constitutional Court, after the Council for the Advancement of the SA Constitution (Casac) moved toward it to have the screening restarted.


Meetings for passes judgment on Fayeeza Kathree-Setiloane, Jody Kollapen, Rammaka Mathopo, Mahube Molemela, Bashier Vally, David Unterhalter and Advocate Alan Dodson SC were put down for Monday.


The eighth applicant, KwaZulu-Natal High Court Judge Dhaya Pillay quit the new screening in the wake of neglecting to be suggested.


The past interviews were broadly scrutinized for being "politicized", especially the meetings of Pillay and Gauteng High Court Judge David Unterhalter, both of whom didn't make the JSC waitlist.

Content created and supplied by: [email protected] (via Opera News )

Concourt Constitutional Court EFF JSC Julius Malema

COMMENTS

Load app to read more comments