Not very far in the past, previous Uyajola 9/9 TV have Jub shook the web when he was uncovered for having supposedly assaulted Amanda Du Pont for the two years they were together. Not just that, witnesses have approached to confirm her side of the story and presently Mzansi has been energizing behind Amanda requesting that equity be served.
The uncover has now seen numerous across online media favor one side on whether or not Amanda was coming clean and others requesting that Jub be allowed an opportunity to give his side of the story. In any case, since that is yet to occur, podcaster Slik Talk has concluded that he is coming for Amanda with all that he has.
"... All that she said in that video is totally bogus. I don't completely accept that word she is saying. Amanda Du "Misrepresentation" we don't trust you, you really want more individuals."
That is not all he said nonetheless. Slik's talk went on to consider Amanda a clout chaser who will do anything for consideration. "You have a fixation on influential men. Jub Jub is fruitful now and you need to clout pursue on this present man's name… "
As per Slik Talk, Amanda possibly announced the occurrence when she understood that Jub is currently more unmistakable than he was at the point at which they were still attached and that she simply needs to destroy his vocation. Quick version, "Amanda is a finished misrepresentation."
Taking to Twitter it appears now drop culture is coming for Slik talk straightaway. Many are finding his tacky remarks on Amanda inappropriate and off the mark. Indeed, he is on Jub's side, however, he ought not to have hauled Amanda's name the manner in which he did.
Many areas are yet in wonderment of how Slik Talk could be so free-lipped with regards to the entire circumstance. Doesn't he fear being sued? What does Slik Talk dread in any case? Is it true that he is consistently the one Provoking each and every other day?
Offensive or not, it appears others are in concurrence with Slik Talk, saying that Amanda's admission was dubious and that it is absolutely impossible that they had been seeing someone two years in a row and she didn't try to say a thing.
What is your take?
Content created and supplied by: GlobalNewsMedia (via Opera News )
Opera News is a free to use platform and the views and opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not represent, reflect or express the views of Opera News. Any/all written content and images displayed are provided by the blogger/author, appear herein as submitted by the blogger/author and are unedited by Opera News. Opera News does not consent to nor does it condone the posting of any content that violates the rights (including the copyrights) of any third party, nor content that may malign, inter alia, any religion, ethnic group, organization, gender, company, or individual. Opera News furthermore does not condone the use of our platform for the purposes encouraging/endorsing hate speech, violation of human rights and/or utterances of a defamatory nature. If the content contained herein violates any of your rights, including those of copyright, and/or violates any the above mentioned factors, you are requested to immediately notify us using via the following email address operanews-external(at)opera.com and/or report the article using the available reporting functionality built into our Platform See More