The South African Revenue Service (SARS) is responsible for the collection of taxes within the Republic of South Africa. The mandate and vision of the South African Revenue Service, quoted from their website, is to:
"Collect all revenues due.
Ensure optimal compliance with Tax, Customs and Excise legislation.
Provide a customs and excise service that will facilitate legitimate trade as well as protect our economy and society.
SARS is driven by the aspiration to contribute directly to the economic and social development of the country by collecting the revenue due to enable government to deliver on its constitutional obligations, policy and delivery priorities in pursuance of better life for all in South Africa. By encouraging tax and customs compliance, we also aspire to contribute to the building of fiscal citizenship reflected by a law abiding society.
The anchor for SARS to deliver on this mandate is the higher purpose and values which drives and informs all SARS employees’ behaviour."
Average person...? What has happened to "We are all equal before the law?”
Zuma's tax records must now be shared. Here's what that means for taxpayer secrecy in SA | Fin24
A court ruling ordering SARS to share the tax records of former president Jacob Zuma with the media doesn't mean that tax information of average taxpayers will become available to whomever asks for it, say analysts.
A court ruling ordering the SA Revenue Service (SARS) to share the tax records of former president Jacob Zuma with the media may herald the start of the rolling back of the tax agency's long-held policy of absolute taxpayer secrecy, according to adjunct associate professor Deborah Tickle of the University of Cape Town's (UCT) Tax Unit.
The two media houses went to court in May, arguing that when the tax compliance of a head of state is in question, they should be able to invoke their rights of access to information, and, if there is a statutory hindrance to this, they should be allowed to challenge its constitutionality.
The allegations of noncompliance that made disclosure imperative, they argued, included that Zuma never filed tax returns for the first seven of his nine years in office; that he owed millions in unpaid taxes for the benefits derived from the tax-funded improvements to his home in Nkandla; and that he received money from illicit sources, including the Gupta family and tobacco smugglers.
Content created and supplied by: Alupheli. (via Opera News )
Opera News is a free to use platform and the views and opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not represent, reflect or express the views of Opera News. Any/all written content and images displayed are provided by the blogger/author, appear herein as submitted by the blogger/author and are unedited by Opera News. Opera News does not consent to nor does it condone the posting of any content that violates the rights (including the copyrights) of any third party, nor content that may malign, inter alia, any religion, ethnic group, organization, gender, company, or individual. Opera News furthermore does not condone the use of our platform for the purposes encouraging/endorsing hate speech, violation of human rights and/or utterances of a defamatory nature. If the content contained herein violates any of your rights, including those of copyright, and/or violates any the above mentioned factors, you are requested to immediately notify us using via the following email address operanews-external(at)opera.com and/or report the article using the available reporting functionality built into our Platform See More